Skip to content
Buy This GLP
← Research
Evidence

GLP-1 drugs were a sixth of Croatia's diabetes scripts and 42.7% of the spend

A fifteen-year national dataset. The gap between share of prescriptions and share of money is what a premium drug looks like on a budget line.

Carla Medina6 min read
GLP-1 share of non-insulin diabetes drugs, Croatia 2024of prescriptions16.1%of the money42.7%€42.07 million in one year, in one small country.Almost none of it for obesity — that indication is not reimbursed.

This desk prices what an individual pays. It is worth occasionally looking at what a whole country pays, because the same ratio shows up: one sixth of the prescriptions, two fifths of the money [1]. That gap between share of use and share of spend is what a premium drug looks like on a budget line — the arithmetic behind whether a GLP-1 is worth its price, scaled up.

Between 2010 and 2024, total non-insulin diabetes drug consumption in Croatia more than doubled. Within that, GLP-1 drugs went from nothing to 15.99 defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day, and to 16.1% of prescriptions in the category. Their share of category spending reached 42.7%, or €42.07 million in a single year. Set the two shares side by side — 16.1% vs 42.7% — and the premium is the whole gap. Semaglutide led on both counts, followed by dulaglutide and liraglutide.

That reimbursement boundary is the practical finding for a buyer. In a system where the diabetes indication is covered and the obesity indication is not, the same molecule has two completely different prices depending on which line of a form is ticked. That is not a Croatian quirk. It is the structure of most coverage everywhere, including the US plans this desk tracks in what insurance actually covers.

Two limits on how far this travels. It is one country of about four million people with its own reimbursement rules and its own negotiated prices, so the euro figure means nothing anywhere else. And the prescription-to-spending ratio, while striking, reflects those negotiated prices too; a country paying differently would show a different gap.

What does transfer is the shape. A drug class that reaches a sixth of prescriptions and takes over two fifths of the budget will attract exactly the cost-containment attention it is attracting, and coverage rules are the lever systems reach for first. For a cash buyer that matters directly, because every tightening pushes more people onto the self-pay prices this desk publishes — the dynamic set out in what employer coverage really reaches.

Frequently asked

How much did Croatia spend on GLP-1 drugs?
€42.07 million in 2024, which was 42.7% of all spending on non-insulin diabetes drugs, against a 16.1% share of prescriptions in that category.
Was that money spent on weight loss?
Mostly no. The authors report obesity-specific indications were underused, largely because they are not reimbursed, so the spending is predominantly diabetes prescribing.
Does this tell me anything about US prices?
Not the euro figure, which reflects one country's negotiated prices. The transferable part is the structure: covered indication and uncovered indication produce two different prices for the same molecule.

Sources

  1. [1] Belančić A, Kučan Štiglić M, Fajkić A, Jelaković A, Pećin I, Reiner Ž (2026). Trends in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist utilization and expenditure in Croatia Journal of International Medical Research. PMID 42570295

Where to get it

Price the injectable sellers

The desk lists every seller that publishes an injectable figure, with the advertised price struck against the one a buyer is billed.

Open the price desk

More in Evidence