Skip to content
Buy This GLP
← Research
Evidence

Half responded on blood sugar alone, and a seventh on everything

Scored across four measures instead of one, most patients passed a single test. Only 15.1% improved on all of them together.

Carla Medina6 min read
What “it worked” meant, in 166 patientsblood sugar only53%blood sugar AND fat mass29.5%little or no response12%fat mass only5.4%Only 15.1% responded on all four measures at once.

“Is it working?” sounds like one question. A cohort study at a Bucharest diabetes center treated it as four, scoring each patient separately on blood sugar, fat mass, inflammation and grip strength after twelve months on a stable regimen [1]. Most people passed one and failed the others. Who responds at all, and how early you can tell, is covered in slow responders at week eight.

The largest group, 53.0%, improved on blood sugar without meeting the fat mass threshold. Only 29.5% did both. A small 5.4% moved fat mass without moving blood sugar, and 12.0% did neither. Taken across all four measures, 47.0% counted as high responders and 15.1% responded on every dimension.

One limitation matters more than the rest for anyone reading this as a drug comparison. This is not a GLP-1 study. It is a cohort on metformin-based regimens in which GLP-1 drugs were one of six add-on options across 166 completers, so the subgroup taking one is small and its size is not stated. The observation that GLP-1 drugs showed the most consistent combined blood-sugar-and-fat-mass response, while insulin was predominantly blood-sugar-only, is a direction rather than a measured comparison, and should not be read as a head-to-head result.

The idea underneath is still worth carrying to a purchase. A seller’s before-and-after reports one number, usually weight, and this study is a reminder that weight moving and metabolic health improving are separate events that often do not coincide. That is also why a grip strength dimension belongs in the scoring at all, and why what patients themselves report as improvement rarely reduces to a number on a scale, as what patients said when asked describes. The cost of losing the wrong tissue is in the cost nobody prices, keeping muscle.

For a reader deciding whether their own treatment is working, the practical translation is to ask what is being measured before accepting the answer. Weight alone is the cheapest thing to measure and the least informative on its own, which is part of why published figures vary as much as they do in the super-responder brand comparison.

Frequently asked

What does it mean for treatment to be working?
This study argues it means different things on different measures. Just over half the cohort improved on blood sugar without meeting the fat mass threshold, and only 15.1% improved on all four measures assessed.
Does this compare GLP-1 drugs against other treatments?
Not in a measurable way. It is a cohort on metformin-based regimens where GLP-1 drugs were one of six add-on classes among 166 completers, so any comparison between classes is directional rather than quantified.
Are these standard definitions of response?
No. The four thresholds were chosen by the authors, and different cut-points would produce different percentages throughout.

Sources

  1. [1] Bujdei-Tebeică I, Pantea-Stoian AM, Mihai DA, Ștefan SD, et al. (2026). Patient-Level Multidimensional Response Phenotypes in Obesity-Associated Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-Month Real-World Cohort Study Journal of Clinical Medicine. PMID 42513584

Where to get it

Price the injectable sellers

The desk lists every seller that publishes an injectable figure, with the advertised price struck against the one a buyer is billed.

Open the price desk

More in Evidence